Monday 18 August 2014

Poverty and Philosophy


What smitten ME most concerning Amartya Sen’s analysis on the workings of impoverishment and its resultant relationship with freedom, is that he appearance on the far side the role of wealth and financial gain as indicators of standing and prosperity in developing countries. whereas nobody will deny that these 2 areas of study aren't any doubt necessary, fractional monetary unit strives to investigate the driving factors behind why individuals area unit poor and why there's difference. His final thesis, that people’s capabilities and their relative economic, political and social freedom area unit what really drive impoverishment, was each a refreshing and substantive statement. Too repeatedly the compelling reasons of why a drag is going on in an exceedingly country area unit unnoted and neglected in favor for a swift and immediate resolution. it's attention-grabbing to notice that Sen’s analysis appears one among the primary examples (at least that I actually have read) proposing that the answer to a drag of impoverishment starts at the supply. we have a tendency to cannot merely expect impoverishment to disappear supported wealth alone, and this distinction is a crucial issue that defines Sen’s work. He states this best once he writes, “Economic growth can not be reasonably treated as a finish in itself. Development must be additional involved with enhancing the lives we have a tendency to lead and therefore the freedoms we have a tendency to enjoy”. Sen’s discussion of organic process issues represents one analysis of impoverishment understood through the lens of political economy, and bolstered with distinctive ethical and philosophical tones. as an example, I assumed that his inclusion of the various aspects of philosophy and liberalism strong his argument and provided and additional analytical check up on the private aspect of impoverishment. The 2 differing kinds of outlooks gave balance to his piece and additionally more additional conflict to the thought of the “informational bases”. when reading this, I used to be smitten by a lot of|what proportion|what quantity} of the data we have a tendency to acquire concerning political economy and impoverishment is extremely much generalized nevertheless restricted. there's most info out there concerning what contributes and ends up in poverty; but, from wherever is all this info originate, and on what facts area unit these conclusions being drawn? I assumed this concept, still as Sen’s notion as “poverty as capability depravation” may notably be applied to this state of Haiti when the recent earthquakes. The ideas projected inside the book will be clearly exemplified in lightweight of the recent devastation, and therefore the widespread impoverishment, lack of difference and “unfreedom” inside the country have all contributed to the break down of the state when the disaster. once applying Sen’s ideas to true in Haiti, the interaction of low financial gain, political instability, and civil rights all persuade strengthen his concept freedom really is that the building block of a making a productive and additional stable society. whereas there's no manner that the author may have enclosed the recent disaster in his writing, my one critique considerations that no bold example of his theory applied to a selected country. whereas several smaller examples got, maybe a few bound side he strove to stress, nobody study was cited to act because the book’s empirical basis, which might are helpful once action an inspiration.